Published: Vol 2, Iss 15, Aug 5, 2012 DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.245 Views: 13807
Protocol Collections
Comprehensive collections of detailed, peer-reviewed protocols focusing on specific topics
Related protocols
Determination of Dissociation Constants for the Interaction of Myosin-5a with its Cargo Protein Using Microscale Thermophoresis (MST)
Rui Zhou [...] Xiang-Dong Li
Feb 5, 2025 774 Views
Direct Activity Measurement of Heterotrimeric Gi Proteins and Gq Protein By Effector Pulldown
Keiichiro Tanaka and Martin A. Schwartz
Aug 5, 2025 1095 Views
Abstract
Tandem affinity purification (TAP) (Pugi et al.,2001; Rigaut et al., 1999) is a method that uses a tagging approach of a target protein of interest for a two-step purification scheme in order to pull down protein complexes under native conditions and expression levels. The TAP tag consists of three components: a calmodulin-binding peptide, a Tobacco etch virus (TEV) protease cleavage site and Protein A which is an immunoglobulin G (IgG)-binding domain. This protocol was modified from the original methodology used in yeast cells(Pugi et al.,2001; Rigaut et al., 1999) for isolation of protein complexes from Drosophila heads and ovaries expressing a TAP tagged protein of interest. To determine in vivo binding partners of the Drosophila fragile X protein (dFMR1), we developed a transgenic strain of flies expressing a recombinant form of dFMR1 with a carboxy-terminal TAP tag (Tsai and Carstens, 2006). To ensure that the construct was expressed at wild-type levels, we engineered this form of the tagged protein in the context of a genomic rescue construct that rescued a mutant sterility phenotype. The purification process was performed using mild conditions to maintain native protein interactions. For TAP methods in Drosophila S2 cell culture, we have successfully used a protocol previously published by Tsai and Carstens (Tsai and Carstens, 2006; Bhogal et al., 2011).
Materials and Reagents
Equipment
Procedure
Recipes
Note: Make buffers without Protease Inhibitor Cocktail without EDTA (PIC w/o EDTA), Na3VO4, CaCl2 and/or DTT. These should be added fresh right before use.
Stock and concentration | volume | Final concentration |
1 M Hepes (pH 7.9) | 200 ml | 10 mM Hepes |
1 M MgCl2 | 30 ml | 1.5 mM MgCl2 |
2 M KCl | 100 ml | 10 mM KCl |
1 M DTT | 10 ml | 0.5 mM DTT |
PIC w/o EDTA | 20 ml | 1x |
H2O | to 20 ml |
Stock and concentration | volume | Final concentration |
1 M Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) | 1 ml | 50 mM Tris-HCl |
5 M NaCl | 2.5 ml | 125 mM NaCl |
100% glycerol | 1 ml | 5% glycerol |
100% NP-40 | 80 ml | 0.2% NP-40 |
1 M MgCl2 | 30 ml | 1.5 mM MgCl2 |
1 M DTT | 20 ml | 1 mM DTT |
1 M NaF | 500 ml | 25 mM NaF |
200 mM Na3VO4 | 100 ml | 1 mM Na3VO4 |
500 mM EDTA | 40 ml | 1 mM EDTA |
2 mM EGTA | 80 ml | 500 mM EGTA |
PIC w/o EDTA | 20 ml | 1x |
H2O | to 20 ml |
Stock and concentration | volume | Final concentration |
1 M Hepes (pH 7.9) | 400 ml | 20 mM Hepes |
87% glycerol | 4.6 ml | 20% glycerol |
100% NP-40 | 200 ml | 0.5% NP-40 |
2 M KCl | 2.5 ml | 200 mM KCl |
1 M DTT | 10 ml | 0.5 mM DTT |
500 mM EDTA | 40 ml | 1 mM EDTA |
20 mM EGTA | 80 ml | 500 mM EGTA |
PIC w/o EDTA | 200 ml | 1x |
H2O | to 20 ml |
Stock and concentration | volume | Final concentration |
1 M Hepes (pH 7.9) | 400 ml | 20 mM Hepes |
87% glycerol | 4.6 ml | 20% glycerol |
100% NP-40 | 200 ml | 0.5% NP-40 |
2 M KCl | 2.5 ml | 200 mM KCl |
1 M DTT | 10 ml | 0.5 mM DTT |
H2O | to 20 ml |
Stock and concentration | volume | Final concentration |
1 M Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) | 1 ml | 10 mM Tris-HCl |
5 M NaCl | 3 ml | 150 mM NaCl |
20% NP-40 | 500 ml | 0.1% NP-40 |
1 M DTT | 50 ml | 0.5 mM EDTA |
H2O | to 100 ml |
Stock and concentration | Volume | Final concentration |
1 M Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) | 1 ml | 10 mM Tris-HCl |
Beta-mercaptoethanol | 69.7 ml | 10 mM Beta-mercaptoethanol |
5 M NaCl | 3 ml | 150 mM NaCl |
1 M Mg-acetate | 100 ml | 1 mM Mg-acetate |
1 M Imidazole | 100 ml | 1 mM Imidazole |
1 M CaCl2 | 200 ml | 2 mM CaCl2 |
20% NP-40 | 500 ml | 0.1% NP-40 |
H2O | to 100 ml |
Stock and concentration | Volume | Final concentration |
1 M Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) | 1 ml | 10 mM Tris-HCl |
Beta-mercaptoethanol | 69.7 ml | 10 mM Beta-mercaptoethanol |
5 M NaCl | 3 ml | 150 mM NaCl |
1 M Mg-acetate | 100 ml | 1 mM Mg-acetate |
1 M Imidazole | 100 ml | 1 mM Imidazole |
20% NP-40 | 500 ml | 0.1% NP-40 |
2 mm EGTA | 400 ml | 500 mM EGTA |
H2O | to 100 ml |
Acknowledgments
This protocol was modified from the original methodology used in yeast cells (Pugi et al., 2001; Rigaut et al., 1999).
References
Article Information
Copyright
© 2012 The Authors; exclusive licensee Bio-protocol LLC.
How to cite
Pepper, A. S., Bhogal, B. and Jongens, T. (2012). Tandem Affinity Purification in Drosophila Heads and Ovaries. Bio-protocol 2(15): e245. DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.245.
Category
Developmental Biology > Cell signaling > TAP tag
Biochemistry > Protein > Interaction
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.
Tips for asking effective questions
+ Description
Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.
Share
Bluesky
X
Copy link